Dispatches
Updated
Connected
Warning: array_merge() [function.array-merge]: Argument #1 is not an array in /home/domusic/deaneogden.com/wp-content/themes/Anan/lib/custom.lib.php on line 645
Recent Posts
Criticism and Feedback
Before releasing EASTERN CHRONICLE, the CONTACT page at deaneogden.com received...
Your Facebook Page: Why I Am Not a Fan
Watch how many people "unlike" my Facebook fan page after this post. Right now it's...
Mixtape: Travel Edition
10. Global Entry The marketing campaign sounds like it was conceived around a table...
Popular Posts
- The Culture of Free
Because of my own musical endeavors and my role at SCOREcast, I'm lucky to get to spend... - What Composers Could Learn from Playing Golf: #4
Whenever I'm in LA, my father and I make a point to at least play a few rounds of golf... - Adam Lambert, Queen, and Creativity
My buddy, composer/producer Steve Ouimette (who I recently sat on a panel with at the 2012... - A Composer's Guide to Social Media
It's the hot buzzword right now, and everybody and their monkey's uncle is a so-called... - The Gift of Disruption
Fête de la Musique happened today (aka "World Music Day"), and while there's...
- The Culture of Free
-
Posted
Topical
announcements apple artistic beginning business career choices collaboration communication community composing computers conversation creatives creativity eastern chronicle family finances friends gear goals helps influences inspiration leadership life Los Angeles money music planning priorities process production projects promotion strategy studio team teamwork technology think time management travel work workflow








Well said Deane, but as much as I applaud the idea of trying to do something about this issue and getting the community behind that as a whole, it's still difficult for me right now to see how a real end to all this will be achieved.
Getting Google to somehow do their bit would be a start and I know that they already do block certain well known sites, but the people behind those sites are smart cookies and will find other ways to reach out to those in love with the "culture of free".
You also mention Megaupload, but that really is one very large and public face in the current fight, and some of the methods used to infiltrate and gather evidence on the people behind it haven't exactly endeared the authorities to those who think that personal privacy and freedom of the internet are a god given right. I'm quite sure there is a whole underground culture of sites and sharing methods that even those that think they know file-sharing and peer to peer networking don't really know about.
I feel like I'm meandering off the course of the conversation a bit here so I'll stop now, but I will say one last thing. The whole battle against digital piracy is really going to boil down to being a battle between on the one side; the rights of the artist to have their work protected and the perceived need to control the general public access to such things via the internet; and those that would advocate the absolute need for a free internet and the right of the people to be able to access whatever content they choose out there and not be censored.
Winning the hearts and minds of the people, especially those that are that used to having access to digital entertainment via the internet for practically nothing, will be the hardest battle of all.
I understand your doubts about solutions coming into play, Terry, but I guess I don't see why that has any bearing on us trying to get the job done regardless. I don't know about you, but in my life when things seem insurmountable, that's not an excuse to lay back, look at the present clear blur sky and daydream that things aren't going to get any better, so enjoy it while it lasts. Instead, it's two steps shy of a dare to tackle it anyway, particularly when an injustice is being done to a group of people I am somewhat indebted to for the existence I've carved out in this business. Of course, I'm speaking now of the Developers. You are every bit as responsible as I am, as a composer who operates with integrity, to come to the aid of those you know in your industry are being taken advantage of. Hell, you and I likely wouldn't even be sitting here typing back and forth to each other if I'd heeded the warnings of many people in 2006 who told me that I was "wasting" my time by investing in an idea like SCOREcast to come alongside struggling and emerging composers.
So, I'm not buying it. It's worth a shot. I don't know what that first shot will be. I don't really even know where to begin shooting. It seems too huge a problem to combat. But, tough shit. I'm not a lazy guy and many people feel the same way. If there is a future in our business, this issue at least needs to be addressed. At the very, very least, it needs to be addressed. Free internet, open internet… yeah yeah. That would be great. If there is a way to do it without hurting businesses whose sole distribution model is internet-based, I'm all for it. But the piracy needs to be looked at and regulated. If corporations wanted it, it would be happening right now.
It's all mindset. You can lay down and lament that it's "difficult for me right now to see how a real end to all this will be achieved". Lots of people feel that way. I feel that way, too… but only for about 5 seconds when I wake back up and look at my computer and think "Okay… I'm a digital creator. This machine, my knowledge and skill applied, is the primary means by which I will raise a family for the next 20+ years." It's that kind of motivation that will push me to keep pursuing an end to this craziness. But I can't just sit around and shake my head at all the insanity going on around me. That's neither productive nor contributive.
Right now I can only tackle this in my own small way, by trying to protect the work I've produced so far and that is already out there. I've already made it known that that is exactly what I intend to do, whether that has any noticeable effect is another thing.
I'm not saying is that "that's the way it is out there so trying to do anything about it is futile", what I am saying is that the problem is huge and complex and it is probably going to take years to turn around if at all. Do we need to adapt our working and marketing policies to the way the things are now? Probably yeah, because the immediate reality of the situation isn't likely to go away any time soon, no matter how much we shout out for a "call to action" or whatever you want to label it as this week.
I want to go along with you on trying to get the community/industry acting as one to try and do something tangible about this, but we all need to step back, have a reality check about it and realise that this is something we are going to have to be involved with for the long haul if we want to see any noticeable change in attitudes at all. If we arrive at a happier place as artists with regards to this in my lifetime I'll be happy with that.
<edit> It's these sort of decisions you'll be fighting against:
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/09/personal-file-sharing-is-legal-in-portugal-prosecutor-says/
I personally can't speak to the issue of composers not getting compensated by people downloading the films they scored, but I do have an opinion on why some composers may download pirated VSTs and other such things….
Reading that composers who are fortunate enough to have the opportunity to score big budget films use pirated software makes me feel like a sucker, and here's why: return on investment, a phrase I've seen you use before. I own all of the software I use, and I MIGHT have made back the money I spent on it (absolutely not counting the money I invested in hardware), but only after many years and a lot of hard work. So let's just rule out the likely majority of people who download these pirated VSTs to make beats for their friends, and focus on a probably immense section of the community you speak of, aspiring composers.
(Warning. The following contains generalizations and will probably be anterior to Dean's way of thinking).
I'd say the odds are better of me winning the lottery thrice then scoring a big budget film (or even a large budget "indie" film). And this is after completely ruling out talent and other such variables. The obvious reason is that very few people are given this opportunity, and are done so repeatedly apparently until they don't want to do it anymore (ie die). I have no reason to think this situation is going to change, especially now with established recording artists being signed on to score said films, too.
So, as someone who is hardly established, but talented, what are my options? Move to LA, uproot my life as I know it, live hand to mouth, and try and expose my work by competing to work for free on student films that will most likely never be seen by anyone? Yeah, the dude who scored Napoleon Dynamite answered an ad on Mandy, and look at what it got him, but there are those lottery odds again. Not to mention I'm a little to old to do all of that.
So where to now? Video Games? Jesper Kyd does all of those. TV? Those odds are still insane, so let's scale it back and shoot for commercials. Most commercials use music by established recording artists, and the music supervisors act like A&R reps. Therefore, while my odds are far better, they are still increasingly being stacked against me.
So now what? I can submit my music to places like Jingle Punks and hope my piece gets picked to go on The Office. But now they're flooded by submissions so they only take them for a week a month. So I submit, and get rejected. That's OK, I'll try again next month. It will be tough with my full time job and other obligations, but I'll keep trying…
How many people do you think are going to continue to do this? From this standpoint it makes some sense to me that maybe someone in a similar situation to myself might be OK with pirating the software they need instead of starting out thousands in the hole. What are the odds they're ever going to get a return on that investment?
My idea would be to try and put together a movement where media embraces original music scored specifically for a production. Not some licensed song by some flavor of the month who wrote the song to move butts at clubs, music that a talented composer made to enhance the action on screen, to actually convey the specific emotions the producer wants to convey. Stop editing TV shows to stock music, and actually have an original song composed to the way you WANT it edited. If this concept took off, legitimately talented composers everywhere would have no problem finding work, and therefore be able to buy their software, and do things right.
Since the odds of Christopher Nolan hand picking some unestablished (but extremely talented) newbie off of the internet to score Batman Resuscitated are nil, I'd love to see other media outlets embrace the aforementioned concept. In the meantime, I'll keep clawing, scratching, and cold calling until I find that break (or meet the guy who knows a guy).
- t
progressnotes.net
<i>From this standpoint it makes some sense to me that maybe someone in a similar situation to myself might be OK with pirating the software they need instead of starting out thousands in the hole. What are the odds they're ever going to get a return on that investment?</i>
The problem I have with this is that it's not about your return on your investment. Software developers don't owe it to you to help you minimize your risk. It's up to you to figure out how to do that legitimately.
Okay. Italics aren't done here apparently. : )
Thanks for the response, and I agree 100%. My point is that there are very few creative opportunities for a talented composer in media. I just spent the last 3 hours cold calling post houses, all of which unsurprisingly use library music, some of them exclusively. Libraries understand they're the only real game in town because they maintain the status quo. Companies can go and sift through thousands of inoffensive, formulaic cues and present them to their clients in minutes. If you're lucky enough to get accepted by a library, you're forced to maintain the status quo, too, or you ain't making money, and probably not even getting listened to. Look at AudioJungle. The Top 10 tracks are the same week after week, month after month, year after year. People don't want to have to look for your inoffensive cues, they'll just take what's sold the most (ie the cue you modeled your cue after). I understand this is a pessimistic view, but I believe that's how things are.
The good news, I think, is that sites like YouTube, which provide a platform for anyone to make anything, will hopefully stimulate creativity, and production companies who make videos regularly will understand that the field is wide open. Your video doesn't have to sound like an established TV show anymore, people are going to watch it regardless. You don't need to license that hot track. You can have one made for you by a talented composer, and actually embrace originality. This is an idea I try to impress on the creatives I'm fortunate enough to have listen to me. Maybe 1 out of 100 will say, "you know what? He's right." But at least it's an idea.